Adds a feature [like GitHub has](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/proposing-changes-to-your-work-with-pull-requests/creating-a-pull-request-from-a-fork) (step 7).
If you create a new PR from a forked repo, you can select (and change later, but only if you are the PR creator/poster) the "Allow edits from maintainers" option.
Then users with write access to the base branch get more permissions on this branch:
* use the update pull request button
* push directly from the command line (`git push`)
* edit/delete/upload files via web UI
* use related API endpoints
You can't merge PRs to this branch with this enabled, you'll need "full" code write permissions.
This feature has a pretty big impact on the permission system. I might forgot changing some things or didn't find security vulnerabilities. In this case, please leave a review or comment on this PR.
Closes #17728
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
* Team permission allow different unit has different permission
* Finish the interface and the logic
* Fix lint
* Fix translation
* align center for table cell content
* Fix fixture
* merge
* Fix test
* Add deprecated
* Improve code
* Add tooltip
* Fix swagger
* Fix newline
* Fix tests
* Fix tests
* Fix test
* Fix test
* Max permission of external wiki and issues should be read
* Move team units with limited max level below units table
* Update label and column names
* Some improvements
* Fix lint
* Some improvements
* Fix template variables
* Add permission docs
* improve doc
* Fix fixture
* Fix bug
* Fix some bug
* fix
* gofumpt
* Integration test for migration (#18124)
integrations: basic test for Gitea {dump,restore}-repo
This is a first step for integration testing of DumpRepository and
RestoreRepository. It:
runs a Gitea server,
dumps a repo via DumpRepository to the filesystem,
restores the repo via RestoreRepository from the filesystem,
dumps the restored repository to the filesystem,
compares the first and second dump and expects them to be identical
The verification is trivial and the goal is to add more tests for each
topic of the dump.
Signed-off-by: Loïc Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
* Team permission allow different unit has different permission
* Finish the interface and the logic
* Fix lint
* Fix translation
* align center for table cell content
* Fix fixture
* merge
* Fix test
* Add deprecated
* Improve code
* Add tooltip
* Fix swagger
* Fix newline
* Fix tests
* Fix tests
* Fix test
* Fix test
* Max permission of external wiki and issues should be read
* Move team units with limited max level below units table
* Update label and column names
* Some improvements
* Fix lint
* Some improvements
* Fix template variables
* Add permission docs
* improve doc
* Fix fixture
* Fix bug
* Fix some bug
* Fix bug
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Aravinth Manivannan <realaravinth@batsense.net>
* Some refactors related repository model
* Move more methods out of repository
* Move repository into models/repo
* Fix test
* Fix test
* some improvements
* Remove unnecessary function
* DBContext is just a Context
This PR removes some of the specialness from the DBContext and makes it context
This allows us to simplify the GetEngine code to wrap around any context in future
and means that we can change our loadRepo(e Engine) functions to simply take contexts.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* fix unit tests
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* another place that needs to set the initial context
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* avoid race
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* change attachment error
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
You can limit or hide organisations. This pull make it also posible for users
- new strings to translte
- add checkbox to user profile form
- add checkbox to admin user.edit form
- filter explore page user search
- filter api admin and public user searches
- allow admins view "hidden" users
- add app option DEFAULT_USER_VISIBILITY
- rewrite many files to use Visibility field
- check for teams intersection
- fix context output
- right fake 404 if not visible
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* ui: show 'owner' tag for real owner
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
* Update custom/conf/app.example.ini
* simplify logic
fix logic
fix a small bug about original author
* remove system manager tag
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
`models.getUserRepoPermission(...)` calls `HasOrgVisible` which
uses `models.x` potentially outside of the transaction `e` provided
as an argument to `getUserRepoPermission`.
This PR switches to use `hasOrgVisible(e, ...)`.
Fix #12983
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* remove a user from being assigned to any issue/PR if (s)he is removed as a collaborator
* fix gender specific comment
* do not remove users that still have access to the repo if they are a member of a team that can access the repo
* add context to errors
* updates
* incorporate review fixes
* Update models/repo_collaboration.go
Co-Authored-By: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
* Update models/repo_collaboration.go
Co-Authored-By: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
* Fix Rebase Relict
* Fix & Impruve
* use xorm builder
* all in one session
* generalize reconsiderIssueAssignees
* Only Unwatch if have no access anymore
* prepare for reuse
* Same things if remove User from Team
* fix lint
* let mysql take time to react
* add description
* CI.restart()
* CI.restart()
Co-authored-by: Lanre Adelowo <yo@lanre.wtf>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <matti@mdranta.net>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
* Restricted users (#4334): initial implementation
* Add User.IsRestricted & UI to edit it
* Pass user object instead of user id to places where IsRestricted flag matters
* Restricted users: maintain access rows for all referenced repos (incl public)
* Take logged in user & IsRestricted flag into account in org/repo listings, searches and accesses
* Add basic repo access tests for restricted users
Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se>
* Mention restricted users in the faq
Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se>
* Revert unnecessary change `.isUserPartOfOrg` -> `.IsUserPartOfOrg`
Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se>
* Remove unnecessary `org.IsOrganization()` call
Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se>
* Revert to an `int64` keyed `accessMap`
* Add type `userAccess`
* Add convenience func updateUserAccess()
* Turn accessMap into a `map[int64]userAccess`
Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se>
* or even better: `map[int64]*userAccess`
* updateUserAccess(): use tighter syntax as suggested by lafriks
* even tighter
* Avoid extra loop
* Don't disclose limited orgs to unauthenticated users
* Don't assume block only applies to orgs
* Use an array of `VisibleType` for filtering
* fix yet another thinko
* Ok - no need for u
* Revert "Ok - no need for u"
This reverts commit 5c3e886aab.
Co-authored-by: Antoine GIRARD <sapk@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
* Send email to assigned user
* Only send mail if enabled
* Mail also when assigned through API
* Need to refactor functions from models to issue service
* Refer to issue index rather than ID
* Disable email notifications completly at initalization if global disable
* Check of user enbled mail shall be in mail notification function only
* Initialize notifications from routers init function.
* Use the assigned comment when sending assigned mail
* Refactor so that assignees always added as separate step when new issue/pr.
* Check error from AddAssignees
* Check if user can be assiged to issue or pull request
* Missing return
* Refactor of CanBeAssigned check.
CanBeAssigned shall have same check as UI.
* Clarify function names (toggle rather than update/change), and clean up.
* Fix review comments.
* Flash error if assignees was not added when creating issue/pr
* Generate error if assignee users doesn't exist
Handle case where an orginization is private but a user who is not a
member of the orgninization has been added as a collaborator of a repo
within that org
Fixes #6962
* fix org visibility bug
* fix permission check
* add integration tests
* fix tests
* change test user name for easier maintainance and fix test
* fix test git repo name
* Add log.ColorFormat and log.ColorFormatted
Structs can now implement log.ColorFormatted to provide their own
colored format when logged with `%-v` or additional flags.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Add basic ColorFormat to repository and user
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Add basic ColorFormat to access and unit
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Add ColorFormat to permission and on trace log it
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Add log.NewColoredIDValue to make ID value coloring consistent
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* formatting changes
* Add some better tracing to permission denied for read issues/pulls
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Add Trace logging on permission denied
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Remove isTrace() check from deferred func
* Adjust repo and allow logging of team
* use FormatInt instead of Itoa
* Add blank line
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Update access.go
