- Use the combo markdown editor for the milestone description. The
milestone description is rendered in markdown, so it makes sense to use
a 'markdown-aware' editor. This also includes the option to use
monospace font.
- Resolves #5649
- When a truncated comment is detected in the RSS/Atom feeds, fetch the
comment from the database and use the original content.
- Added integration test.
- Resolves #5650
Since they are written to the milestone that is still open, there is
no risk of confusing them with final release notes. Such a distinction
is more relevant when in the context of a release notes file committed
to the repository.
* added a message for the case where the user's profile is private but the Public activity is not hidden
The activity is still hidden anyway because the profile is private, but previously the message would say:
`Your activity is visible to everyone, except for interactions in private spaces...`
which I would consider as a flaw of the original implementation. Now it will say:
`Your activity is only visible to you and the instance administrators because your profile is private...`
* started showing the message for admins that the activity they see should remain private in the case
where the whole profile is private, not just the activity tab. Previously it would say:
This activity is visible to everyone, but as an administrator you can also see interactions in private spaces.`
which I would also consider as a flaw of the original implementation. Now it will say:
`This activity is visible to you because you're an administrator, but the user wants it to remain private.`
* added test cases
* bumped up the number of our GPL-licensed files
Preview
For both screenshots, Forgejo would previously display misinformation.
Change 1: User viewing their private profile, but activity isn't configured as hidden
https://codeberg.org/attachments/6659c80c-15dd-48be-a379-db737fd1dd5e
Change 2: Admin viewing user's private profile
https://codeberg.org/attachments/220da57f-b658-4474-9ad2-049e8438a0af
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/5638
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
- When an admin wants syncronize tags in the Git data to the database
via the admin dashboard all annoted tags loses their title. This was
caused because the code didn't correctly handle annoted tags. Annoted
tags have their own objectID to store the annoted message, unlike
'normal' tags which point to the commitID. While the function was being
run for annoted tags, the code thought it found a mismatch in the
objectIDs, because the stored version was actually correct which pointed
to the commitID but the code found the objectID of the annoted tag.
- Make `SyncReleasesWithTags` corectly handle annoted tags.
- Added unit and integration tests.
- Resolves #5628
This change does not bring the desired benefit, because the button is
reinitialized from a Vue component once loaded, overriding this change
and causing a visual glitch upon page load (the button is moving its
position).
See the comment:
> this code must match the code in BranchTagSelector.vue
This button is also used in other places such as the release list where
the additional margin does not fit well. As such, this needs a new
solution.
This reverts commit 18cad9d342.
- This is another regression from
5a0bc35799, where the default value was
changed to "alphabetically" because it relied on `ExploreDefaultSort`
providing a fallback value.
- Set the default value for `EXPLORE_DEFAULT_SORT` to `recentupdate`,
this was already the behavior explicitly for existing users of this setting
but with 5a0bc35799 it didn't provide a
explicit fallback to `recentupdate`. So opting for a 'easy' fix, that
doesn't add boilerplate code to those instances.
this will result in better api clients generated out of the openapi docs
... for SearchIssues
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
(cherry picked from commit d638067d3cb0a7f69b4d899f65b9be4940bd3e41)
fix #32258
Errors in the issue was due to unhandled null check. so i fixed it.
### Detailed description for Issue & Fix
To reproduce that issue, the comment must be deleted on Conversation
tab.
#### Before Delete
<img width="1032" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/72df61ba-7db6-44c9-bebc-ca1178dd27f1">
#### After Delete (AS-IS)
<img width="1010" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/36fa537e-4f8e-4535-8d02-e538c50f0dd8">
gitea already have remove logic for `timeline-item-group`, but because
of null ref exception the later logic that removes `timeline-item-group`
could be not be called correctly.
(cherry picked from commit 603fca1e27bc29c1e700cc1bd284eb619d2436c8)
close #25833
Currently, the information for "requested_reviewers" is only included in
the webhook event for reviews. I would like to suggest adding this
information to the webhook event for "PullRequest comment" as well, as
they both pertain to the "PullRequest" event.
Also, The reviewer information for the Pull Request is not displayed
when it is approved or rejected.
(cherry picked from commit d50ed0abf731a10741831d4b6dd54791e3e567ec)
fix https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/32226
in https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/27775 , it do some changes to
only show diff file tree when more than one file changed. But looks it
also break the `diff-file-list` logic, which looks not expected change.
so try fix it.
/cc @silverwind
example view:
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
(cherry picked from commit c4b2808b896dd86323c6a0d119c8cf24752d4d8a)
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Conflicts:
- web_src/js/features/repo-diff-filetree.js
web_src/js/features/repo-diff.js
Conflicts resolved by manually applying the changes.
