1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git synced 2024-11-24 08:57:03 -05:00
Commit graph

11 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Giteabot
193e04c43b
Fix verifyCommits error when push a new branch (#26664) (#26810)
Backport #26664 by @CaiCandong

> ### Description
> If a new branch is pushed, and the repository has a rule that would
require signed commits for the new branch, the commit is rejected with a
500 error regardless of whether it's signed.
>
> When pushing a new branch, the "old" commit is the empty ID
(0000000000000000000000000000000000000000). verifyCommits has no
provision for this and passes an invalid commit range to git rev-list.
Prior to 1.19 this wasn't an issue because only pre-existing individual
branches could be protected.
>
> I was able to reproduce with
[try.gitea.io/CraigTest/test](https://try.gitea.io/CraigTest/test),
which is set up with a blanket rule to require commits on all branches.

Fix #25565
Very thanks to @Craig-Holmquist-NTI for reporting the bug and suggesting
an valid solution!

Co-authored-by: CaiCandong <50507092+CaiCandong@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 93c36f395c)
2023-09-08 08:09:18 +02:00
wxiaoguang
f4538791f5
Refactor internal API for git commands, use meaningful messages instead of "Internal Server Error" (#23687)
# Why this PR comes

At first, I'd like to help users like #23636 (there are a lot)

The unclear "Internal Server Error" is quite anonying, scare users,
frustrate contributors, nobody knows what happens.

So, it's always good to provide meaningful messages to end users (of
course, do not leak sensitive information).

When I started working on the "response message to end users", I found
that the related code has a lot of technical debt. A lot of copy&paste
code, unclear fields and usages.

So I think it's good to make everything clear.

# Tech Backgrounds

Gitea has many sub-commands, some are used by admins, some are used by
SSH servers or Git Hooks. Many sub-commands use "internal API" to
communicate with Gitea web server.

Before, Gitea server always use `StatusCode + Json "err" field` to
return messages.

* The CLI sub-commands: they expect to show all error related messages
to site admin
* The Serv/Hook sub-commands (for git clients): they could only show
safe messages to end users, the error log could only be recorded by
"SSHLog" to Gitea web server.

In the old design, it assumes that:

* If the StatusCode is 500 (in some functions), then the "err" field is
error log, shouldn't be exposed to git client.
* If the StatusCode is 40x, then the "err" field could be exposed. And
some functions always read the "err" no matter what the StatusCode is.

The old code is not strict, and it's difficult to distinguish the
messages clearly and then output them correctly.

# This PR

To help to remove duplicate code and make everything clear, this PR
introduces `ResponseExtra` and `requestJSONResp`.

* `ResponseExtra` is a struct which contains "extra" information of a
internal API response, including StatusCode, UserMsg, Error
* `requestJSONResp` is a generic function which can be used for all
cases to help to simplify the calls.
* Remove all `map["err"]`, always use `private.Response{Err}` to
construct error messages.
* User messages and error messages are separated clearly, the `fail` and
`handleCliResponseExtra` will output correct messages.
* Replace all `Internal Server Error` messages with meaningful (still
safe) messages.

This PR saves more than 300 lines, while makes the git client messages
more clear.

Many gitea-serv/git-hook related essential functions are covered by
tests.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-03-29 14:32:26 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
bd820aa9c5
Add context cache as a request level cache (#22294)
To avoid duplicated load of the same data in an HTTP request, we can set
a context cache to do that. i.e. Some pages may load a user from a
database with the same id in different areas on the same page. But the
code is hidden in two different deep logic. How should we share the
user? As a result of this PR, now if both entry functions accept
`context.Context` as the first parameter and we just need to refactor
`GetUserByID` to reuse the user from the context cache. Then it will not
be loaded twice on an HTTP request.

But of course, sometimes we would like to reload an object from the
database, that's why `RemoveContextData` is also exposed.

The core context cache is here. It defines a new context
```go
type cacheContext struct {
	ctx  context.Context
	data map[any]map[any]any
        lock sync.RWMutex
}

var cacheContextKey = struct{}{}

func WithCacheContext(ctx context.Context) context.Context {
	return context.WithValue(ctx, cacheContextKey, &cacheContext{
		ctx:  ctx,
		data: make(map[any]map[any]any),
	})
}
```

Then you can use the below 4 methods to read/write/del the data within
the same context.

```go
func GetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any) any
func SetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key, value any)
func RemoveContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any)
func GetWithContextCache[T any](ctx context.Context, cacheGroupKey string, cacheTargetID any, f func() (T, error)) (T, error)
```

Then let's take a look at how `system.GetString` implement it.

```go
func GetSetting(ctx context.Context, key string) (string, error) {
	return cache.GetWithContextCache(ctx, contextCacheKey, key, func() (string, error) {
		return cache.GetString(genSettingCacheKey(key), func() (string, error) {
			res, err := GetSettingNoCache(ctx, key)
			if err != nil {
				return "", err
			}
			return res.SettingValue, nil
		})
	})
}
```

First, it will check if context data include the setting object with the
key. If not, it will query from the global cache which may be memory or
a Redis cache. If not, it will get the object from the database. In the
end, if the object gets from the global cache or database, it will be
set into the context cache.

An object stored in the context cache will only be destroyed after the
context disappeared.
2023-02-15 21:37:34 +08:00
flynnnnnnnnnn
e81ccc406b
Implement FSFE REUSE for golang files (#21840)
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.

Fix #16132

Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2022-11-27 18:20:29 +00:00
wxiaoguang
dcd9fc7ee8
Refactor git command arguments and make all arguments to be safe to be used (#21535)
Follow #21464

Make all git command arguments strictly safe. Most changes are one-to-one replacing, keep all existing logic.
2022-10-23 22:44:45 +08:00
wxiaoguang
124b072f0b
Remove git.Command.Run and git.Command.RunInDir* (#19280)
Follows #19266, #8553, Close #18553, now there are only three `Run..(&RunOpts{})` functions.
 * before: `stdout, err := RunInDir(path)`
 * now: `stdout, _, err := RunStdString(&git.RunOpts{Dir:path})`
2022-04-01 10:55:30 +08:00
Martin Scholz
26718a785a
Change git.cmd to RunWithContext (#18693)
Change all `cmd...Pipeline` commands to `cmd.RunWithContext`.

#18553

Co-authored-by: Martin Scholz <martin.scholz@versasec.com>
2022-02-11 13:47:22 +01:00
6543
3043eb36bf
Delete old git.NewCommand() and use it as git.NewCommandContext() (#18552) 2022-02-06 20:01:47 +01:00
zeripath
5cb0c9aa0d
Propagate context and ensure git commands run in request context (#17868)
This PR continues the work in #17125 by progressively ensuring that git
commands run within the request context.

This now means that the if there is a git repo already open in the context it will be used instead of reopening it.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2022-01-19 23:26:57 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
3ca5dc7e32
Move keys to models/asymkey (#17917)
* Move keys to models/keys

* Rename models/keys -> models/asymkey

* change the missed package name

* Fix package alias

* Fix test

* Fix docs

* Fix test

* Fix test

* merge
2021-12-10 16:14:24 +08:00
zeripath
8de44d1995
Clean-up HookPreReceive and restore functionality for pushing non-standard refs (#16705)
* Clean-up HookPreReceive and restore functionality for pushing non-standard refs

There was an inadvertent breaking change in #15629 meaning that notes refs and other
git extension refs will be automatically rejected.

Further following #14295 and #15629 the pre-recieve hook code is untenably long and
too complex.

This PR refactors the hook code and removes the incorrect forced rejection of
non-standard refs.

Fix #16688

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2021-09-16 15:34:54 +02:00