Reduce the GC pressure from the websocket event method by splitting it
into an event getter and a buffer getter.
Before:
165.9k msg/sec
After:
169.9k msg/sec
This switches syscall used in HTTP and WS server from "writev"
to "sendto".
"DENO_USE_WRITEV=1" can be used to enable using "writev" syscall.
Doing this for easier testing of various setups.
This commit migrates "deno_core" from using "FuturesUnordered" to
"tokio::task::JoinSet". This makes every op to be a separate Tokio task
and should unlock better utilization of kqueue/epoll.
There were two quirks added to this PR:
- because of the fact that "JoinSet" immediately polls spawn tasks,
op sanitizers can give false positives in some cases, this was
alleviated by polling event loop once before running a test with
"deno test", which gives canceled ops an opportunity to settle
- "JsRuntimeState::waker" was moved to "OpState::waker" so that FFI
API can still use threadsafe functions - without this change the
registered wakers were wrong as they would not wake up the
whole "JsRuntime" but the task associated with an op
---------
Co-authored-by: Matt Mastracci <matthew@mastracci.com>
Using `deopt-explorer` I found that a bunch of fields on `WebSocket`
class were polymorphic.
Fortunately it was enough to initialize them to `undefined`
to fix the problem.
This is a quick tool that I've been using to build benchmarking builds
for Deno.
Usage:
Build a benchmark `HEAD~1` and `origin/main` executable:
```sh
deno run tools/build_bench.ts HEAD~1 origin/main
```
Build debug benchmark executables of the last three commits:
```sh
deno run tools/build_bench.ts --profile debug HEAD HEAD~1 HEAD~2
```
No need to go through the async machinery for `send(String | Buffer)` --
we can fire and forget, and then route any send errors into the async
call we're already making (`op_ws_next_event`).
Early benchmark on MacOS:
Before: 155.8k msg/sec
After: 166.2k msg/sec (+6.6%)
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
This commit adds basic support for "node:http2" module. Not
all APIs have been yet implemented, but this change already
allows to use this module for some basic functions.
The "grpc" package is still not working, but it's a good stepping
stone.
---------
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
## WHY
ref: https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/19165
The FileHandle class has many missing methods compared to node.
Add these.
## WHAT
- Add close method
---------
Co-authored-by: Matt Mastracci <matthew@mastracci.com>
In case you would consider including specific implementations and not
only build fixes, here's the implementation of the ```rss()``` function
for OpenBSD.
Related issue: https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/19358.
This is a regression that seems to have been introduced in
https://github.com/denoland/deno/pull/18905. It looks to have been a
performance optimization.
The issue is probably easiest described with some code:
```ts
const target = new EventTarget();
const event = new Event("foo");
target.addEventListener("foo", () => {
console.log('base');
target.addEventListener("foo", () => {
console.log('nested');
});
});
target.dispatchEvent(event);
```
Essentially, the second event listener is being attached while the `foo`
event is still being dispatched. It should then not fire that second
event listener, but Deno currently does.
`rusqlite` does not support async operations; with this PR SQLite
operations will run through `spawn_blocking` to ensure that the event
loop does not get blocked.
There is still only a single SQLite connection. So all operations will
do an async wait on the connection. In the future we can add a
connection pool if needed.
This PR attempts to resolve the first item on the list from
https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/19330 which is about using a
flat list of interleaved key/value pairs, instead of a nested array of
tuples.
I can tackle some more if you can provide a quick example of using raw
v8 arrays, cc @mmastrac
<!--
Before submitting a PR, please read https://deno.com/manual/contributing
1. Give the PR a descriptive title.
Examples of good title:
- fix(std/http): Fix race condition in server
- docs(console): Update docstrings
- feat(doc): Handle nested reexports
Examples of bad title:
- fix #7123
- update docs
- fix bugs
2. Ensure there is a related issue and it is referenced in the PR text.
3. Ensure there are tests that cover the changes.
4. Ensure `cargo test` passes.
5. Ensure `./tools/format.js` passes without changing files.
6. Ensure `./tools/lint.js` passes.
7. Open as a draft PR if your work is still in progress. The CI won't
run
all steps, but you can add '[ci]' to a commit message to force it to.
8. If you would like to run the benchmarks on the CI, add the 'ci-bench'
label.
-->
Internally, `node-tap` spawns a child process with `stdio: [0, 1, 2]`.
Whilst we don't support passing fd numbers as an argument so far, it
turns out that `[0, 1, 2]` is equivalent to `"inherit"` which we already
support. See: https://nodejs.org/api/child_process.html#optionsstdio
Mapping it to `"inherit"` is fine for us and gets us one step closer in
getting `node-tap` working. I'm now at the stage where already the
coverage table is shown 🎉
<!--
Before submitting a PR, please read https://deno.com/manual/contributing
1. Give the PR a descriptive title.
Examples of good title:
- fix(std/http): Fix race condition in server
- docs(console): Update docstrings
- feat(doc): Handle nested reexports
Examples of bad title:
- fix #7123
- update docs
- fix bugs
2. Ensure there is a related issue and it is referenced in the PR text.
3. Ensure there are tests that cover the changes.
4. Ensure `cargo test` passes.
5. Ensure `./tools/format.js` passes without changing files.
6. Ensure `./tools/lint.js` passes.
7. Open as a draft PR if your work is still in progress. The CI won't
run
all steps, but you can add '[ci]' to a commit message to force it to.
8. If you would like to run the benchmarks on the CI, add the 'ci-bench'
label.
-->
## WHY
ref: https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/19165
Node's fs/promises includes a FileHandle class, but deno does not. The
open function in Node's fs/promises returns a FileHandle, which provides
an IO interface to the file. However, deno's open function returns a
resource id.
### deno
```js
> const fs = await import("node:fs/promises");
undefined
> const file3 = await fs.open("./README.md");
undefined
> file3
3
> file3.read
undefined
Node:
```
### Node
```js
> const fs = await import("fs/promises");
undefined
> const file3 = await fs.open("./tests/e2e_unit/testdata/file.txt");
undefined
> file3
FileHandle {
_events: [Object: null prototype] {},
_eventsCount: 0,
_maxListeners: undefined,
close: [Function: close],
[Symbol(kCapture)]: false,
[Symbol(kHandle)]: FileHandle {},
[Symbol(kFd)]: 24,
[Symbol(kRefs)]: 1,
[Symbol(kClosePromise)]: null
}
> file3.read
[Function: read]
```
To be compatible with Node, deno's open function should also return a
FileHandle.
## WHAT
I have implemented the first step in adding a FileHandle.
- Changed the return value of the open function to a FileHandle object
- Implemented the readFile method in FileHandle
- Add test code
## What to do next
This PR is the first step in adding a FileHandle, and there are things
that should be done next.
- Add functionality equivalent to Node's FileHandle to FileHandle
(currently there is only readFile)
---------
Co-authored-by: Matt Mastracci <matthew@mastracci.com>
Adds an import map of the core and ext JavaScript files. This was
created manually but a script to create one automatically wouldn't be
too much of a big thing either.
This should make working on especially the Node polyfills much more
pleasant, as it gives you feedback on if your imports are correct.
Unfortunately the TypeScript declaration files of some of the internal
modules clash with the import map and override the data from the actual
files with data from the declaration files. Those do not contain all
exports nor is their data always up to date. Still, this is much better
than not having one.
