Part of #25028.
Our underlying read/write operations in `io` assume the buffer is a
Uint8Array, but we were passing in other typed arrays (in the case above
it was `Int8Array`).
This PR ensures that we forward a `rename` event in our file watcher.
The rust lib we use combines that with the `modify` event.
This fixes a compatibility issue with Node too, which sends the `rename`
event as well.
Fixes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/24880
Use `access` on *nix and `GetFileAttributesW` on Windows.
[Benchmark](https://paste.divy.work/p/-gq8Ark.js):
```
$ deno run -A bench.mjs # main (568dd)
existsSync: 8980.636629ms
$ target/release/deno run -A bench.mjs # this PR
existsSync: 6448.7604519999995ms
$ bun bench.mjs
existsSync: 6562.88671ms
$ node bench.mjs
existsSync: 7740.064653ms
```
Ref https://github.com/denoland/deno/pull/24434#discussion_r1679777912
Part of #18218
- Adds `fs.lutimes` and `fs.lutimesSync` to our node polyfills. To do
this I added methods to the `FileSystem` trait + ops to expose the
functionality to JS.
- Exports `fs._toUnixTimestamp`. Node exposes an internal util
`toUnixTimestamp` from the fs module to be used by unit tests (so we
need it for the unit test to pass unmodified). It's weird because it's
only supposed to be used internally but it's still publicly accessible
- Matches up error handling and timestamp handling for fs.futimes and
fs.utimes with node
- Enables the node_compat utimes test - this exercises futimes, lutimes,
and utimes.
We didn't support the `throwIfNoEntry` option for Node's `fs.lstatSync`
method. Note that the async variant doesn't have this option.
Fixes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/23996
This change:
1. Implements `Deno.FsFile.sync()` and `Deno.FsFile.syncSync()`.
2. Deprecates `Deno.fsync()` and `Deno.fsyncSync()` for removal in Deno
v2, in favour of the above corresponding methods.
Related #21995
---------
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
This change:
1. Implements `Deno.FsFile.dataSync()` and `Deno.FsFile.dataSyncSync()`.
2. Deprecates `Deno.fdatasync()` and `Deno.fdatasyncSync()` for removal
in Deno v2, in favour of the above corresponding methods.
3. Replaces use of `Deno.fdatasync()` and `Deno.fdatasyncSync()` with
the above instance methods.
Related #21995
<!--
Before submitting a PR, please read https://deno.com/manual/contributing
1. Give the PR a descriptive title.
Examples of good title:
- fix(std/http): Fix race condition in server
- docs(console): Update docstrings
- feat(doc): Handle nested reexports
Examples of bad title:
- fix #7123
- update docs
- fix bugs
2. Ensure there is a related issue and it is referenced in the PR text.
3. Ensure there are tests that cover the changes.
4. Ensure `cargo test` passes.
5. Ensure `./tools/format.js` passes without changing files.
6. Ensure `./tools/lint.js` passes.
7. Open as a draft PR if your work is still in progress. The CI won't
run
all steps, but you can add '[ci]' to a commit message to force it to.
8. If you would like to run the benchmarks on the CI, add the 'ci-bench'
label.
-->
## WHY
ref: https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/19165
Node's fs/promises includes a FileHandle class, but deno does not. The
open function in Node's fs/promises returns a FileHandle, which provides
an IO interface to the file. However, deno's open function returns a
resource id.
### deno
```js
> const fs = await import("node:fs/promises");
undefined
> const file3 = await fs.open("./README.md");
undefined
> file3
3
> file3.read
undefined
Node:
```
### Node
```js
> const fs = await import("fs/promises");
undefined
> const file3 = await fs.open("./tests/e2e_unit/testdata/file.txt");
undefined
> file3
FileHandle {
_events: [Object: null prototype] {},
_eventsCount: 0,
_maxListeners: undefined,
close: [Function: close],
[Symbol(kCapture)]: false,
[Symbol(kHandle)]: FileHandle {},
[Symbol(kFd)]: 24,
[Symbol(kRefs)]: 1,
[Symbol(kClosePromise)]: null
}
> file3.read
[Function: read]
```
To be compatible with Node, deno's open function should also return a
FileHandle.
## WHAT
I have implemented the first step in adding a FileHandle.
- Changed the return value of the open function to a FileHandle object
- Implemented the readFile method in FileHandle
- Add test code
## What to do next
This PR is the first step in adding a FileHandle, and there are things
that should be done next.
- Add functionality equivalent to Node's FileHandle to FileHandle
(currently there is only readFile)
---------
Co-authored-by: Matt Mastracci <matthew@mastracci.com>
This commit renames "deno_core::InternalModuleLoader" to
"ExtModuleLoader" and changes the specifiers used by the
modules loaded from this loader to "ext:".
"internal:" scheme was really ambiguous and it's more characters than
"ext:", which should result in slightly smaller snapshot size.
Closes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/18020
