It's best that this only gets merged with the latest version of the
suite, so there's little difference between the `ci` and `wpt_epoch`
workflows. This should make troubleshooting easier.
This allows people to use imports like:
```ts
import "./app.css";
```
...with `deno check` in systems where there's a bundle step (ex. Vite).
This will still error when using it with `deno run` or if the referenced
file does not exist.
See test cases for behaviour.
This PR adds a benchmark intended to measure how the LSP handles larger
repos, as well as its performance on a more realistic workload.
The repo being benchmarked is
[deco-cx/apps](https://github.com/deco-cx/apps) which has been vendored
along with its dependencies. It's included as a git submodule as its
fairly large. The LSP requests used in the benchmark are the actual
requests sent by VSCode as I opened, modified, and navigated around a
file (to simulate an actual user interaction).
The main motivation is to have a more realistic benchmark that measures
how we do with a large number of files and dependencies. The
improvements made from 1.42 to 1.42.3 mostly improved performance with
larger repos, so none of our existing benchmarks showed an improvement.
Here are the results for the changes made from 1.42 to 1.42.3 (the new
benchmark is the last one listed):
**1.42.0**
```test
Starting Deno benchmark
-> Start benchmarking lsp
- Simple Startup/Shutdown
(10 runs, mean: 379ms)
- Big Document/Several Edits
(5 runs, mean: 1142ms)
- Find/Replace
(10 runs, mean: 51ms)
- Code Lens
(10 runs, mean: 443ms)
- deco-cx/apps Multiple Edits + Navigation
(5 runs, mean: 25121ms)
<- End benchmarking lsp
```
**1.42.3**
```text
Starting Deno benchmark
-> Start benchmarking lsp
- Simple Startup/Shutdown
(10 runs, mean: 383ms)
- Big Document/Several Edits
(5 runs, mean: 1135ms)
- Find/Replace
(10 runs, mean: 55ms)
- Code Lens
(10 runs, mean: 440ms)
- deco-cx/apps Multiple Edits + Navigation
(5 runs, mean: 11675ms)
<- End benchmarking lsp
```
`TestEventSender` should not be Clone so we don't end up with multiple
copies of the same writer FD. This is probably not the cause of the test
channel lockups, but it's a lot easier to reason about.
Closes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/23362
Previously we were panicking if there was a pending read on a
port and `receiveMessageOnPort` was called. This is now fixed
by cancelling the pending read, trying to read a message and
resuming reading in a loop.
Due to a terminating NUL that was placed in a `r#` string, we were not
actually NUL-terminating pipe names on Windows. While this has no
security implications due to the random nature of the prefix, it would
occasionally cause random failures when the trailing garbage would make
the pipe name invalid.
This commit moves logic of dispatching lifecycle events (
"load", "beforeunload", "unload") to be triggered from Rust.
Before that we were executing scripts from Rust, but now we
are storing references to functions from "99_main.js" and calling
them directly.
Prerequisite for https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/23342
I'm running into a node resolution bug in the lsp only and while
tracking it down I noticed this one.
Fixed by moving the project version out of `Documents`.
…faces (#23296)"
This reverts commit e190acbfa8.
Reverting because it broke stable API type declarations. We will reland
it for v1.43 with updated interfaces
Fixes the regression described in
https://github.com/denoland/deno/pull/23293#issuecomment-2049819724.
This affected jupyter notebooks, as the LSP was passing in already
denormalized specifiers, while the jupyter kernel was not. We need to
denormalize the specifiers to evict the proper keys from our caches.
Currently we evict a lot of the caches on the JS side of things on every
request, namely script versions, script file names, and compiler
settings (as of #23283, it's not quite every request but it's still
unnecessarily often).
This PR reports changes to the JS side, so that it can evict exactly the
caches that it needs too. We might want to do some batching in the
future so as not to do 1 request per change.
