Reduce the GC pressure from the websocket event method by splitting it
into an event getter and a buffer getter.
Before:
165.9k msg/sec
After:
169.9k msg/sec
This switches syscall used in HTTP and WS server from "writev"
to "sendto".
"DENO_USE_WRITEV=1" can be used to enable using "writev" syscall.
Doing this for easier testing of various setups.
This commit migrates "deno_core" from using "FuturesUnordered" to
"tokio::task::JoinSet". This makes every op to be a separate Tokio task
and should unlock better utilization of kqueue/epoll.
There were two quirks added to this PR:
- because of the fact that "JoinSet" immediately polls spawn tasks,
op sanitizers can give false positives in some cases, this was
alleviated by polling event loop once before running a test with
"deno test", which gives canceled ops an opportunity to settle
- "JsRuntimeState::waker" was moved to "OpState::waker" so that FFI
API can still use threadsafe functions - without this change the
registered wakers were wrong as they would not wake up the
whole "JsRuntime" but the task associated with an op
---------
Co-authored-by: Matt Mastracci <matthew@mastracci.com>
Using `deopt-explorer` I found that a bunch of fields on `WebSocket`
class were polymorphic.
Fortunately it was enough to initialize them to `undefined`
to fix the problem.
No need to go through the async machinery for `send(String | Buffer)` --
we can fire and forget, and then route any send errors into the async
call we're already making (`op_ws_next_event`).
Early benchmark on MacOS:
Before: 155.8k msg/sec
After: 166.2k msg/sec (+6.6%)
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
This commit adds basic support for "node:http2" module. Not
all APIs have been yet implemented, but this change already
allows to use this module for some basic functions.
The "grpc" package is still not working, but it's a good stepping
stone.
---------
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
## WHY
ref: https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/19165
The FileHandle class has many missing methods compared to node.
Add these.
## WHAT
- Add close method
---------
Co-authored-by: Matt Mastracci <matthew@mastracci.com>
Related issue: https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/19358.
This is a regression that seems to have been introduced in
https://github.com/denoland/deno/pull/18905. It looks to have been a
performance optimization.
The issue is probably easiest described with some code:
```ts
const target = new EventTarget();
const event = new Event("foo");
target.addEventListener("foo", () => {
console.log('base');
target.addEventListener("foo", () => {
console.log('nested');
});
});
target.dispatchEvent(event);
```
Essentially, the second event listener is being attached while the `foo`
event is still being dispatched. It should then not fire that second
event listener, but Deno currently does.
`rusqlite` does not support async operations; with this PR SQLite
operations will run through `spawn_blocking` to ensure that the event
loop does not get blocked.
There is still only a single SQLite connection. So all operations will
do an async wait on the connection. In the future we can add a
connection pool if needed.
This PR attempts to resolve the first item on the list from
https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/19330 which is about using a
flat list of interleaved key/value pairs, instead of a nested array of
tuples.
I can tackle some more if you can provide a quick example of using raw
v8 arrays, cc @mmastrac
<!--
Before submitting a PR, please read https://deno.com/manual/contributing
1. Give the PR a descriptive title.
Examples of good title:
- fix(std/http): Fix race condition in server
- docs(console): Update docstrings
- feat(doc): Handle nested reexports
Examples of bad title:
- fix #7123
- update docs
- fix bugs
2. Ensure there is a related issue and it is referenced in the PR text.
3. Ensure there are tests that cover the changes.
4. Ensure `cargo test` passes.
5. Ensure `./tools/format.js` passes without changing files.
6. Ensure `./tools/lint.js` passes.
7. Open as a draft PR if your work is still in progress. The CI won't
run
all steps, but you can add '[ci]' to a commit message to force it to.
8. If you would like to run the benchmarks on the CI, add the 'ci-bench'
label.
-->
Internally, `node-tap` spawns a child process with `stdio: [0, 1, 2]`.
Whilst we don't support passing fd numbers as an argument so far, it
turns out that `[0, 1, 2]` is equivalent to `"inherit"` which we already
support. See: https://nodejs.org/api/child_process.html#optionsstdio
Mapping it to `"inherit"` is fine for us and gets us one step closer in
getting `node-tap` working. I'm now at the stage where already the
coverage table is shown 🎉
<!--
Before submitting a PR, please read https://deno.com/manual/contributing
1. Give the PR a descriptive title.
Examples of good title:
- fix(std/http): Fix race condition in server
- docs(console): Update docstrings
- feat(doc): Handle nested reexports
Examples of bad title:
- fix #7123
- update docs
- fix bugs
2. Ensure there is a related issue and it is referenced in the PR text.
3. Ensure there are tests that cover the changes.
4. Ensure `cargo test` passes.
5. Ensure `./tools/format.js` passes without changing files.
6. Ensure `./tools/lint.js` passes.
7. Open as a draft PR if your work is still in progress. The CI won't
run
all steps, but you can add '[ci]' to a commit message to force it to.
8. If you would like to run the benchmarks on the CI, add the 'ci-bench'
label.
-->
## WHY
ref: https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/19165
Node's fs/promises includes a FileHandle class, but deno does not. The
open function in Node's fs/promises returns a FileHandle, which provides
an IO interface to the file. However, deno's open function returns a
resource id.
### deno
```js
> const fs = await import("node:fs/promises");
undefined
> const file3 = await fs.open("./README.md");
undefined
> file3
3
> file3.read
undefined
Node:
```
### Node
```js
> const fs = await import("fs/promises");
undefined
> const file3 = await fs.open("./tests/e2e_unit/testdata/file.txt");
undefined
> file3
FileHandle {
_events: [Object: null prototype] {},
_eventsCount: 0,
_maxListeners: undefined,
close: [Function: close],
[Symbol(kCapture)]: false,
[Symbol(kHandle)]: FileHandle {},
[Symbol(kFd)]: 24,
[Symbol(kRefs)]: 1,
[Symbol(kClosePromise)]: null
}
> file3.read
[Function: read]
```
To be compatible with Node, deno's open function should also return a
FileHandle.
## WHAT
I have implemented the first step in adding a FileHandle.
- Changed the return value of the open function to a FileHandle object
- Implemented the readFile method in FileHandle
- Add test code
## What to do next
This PR is the first step in adding a FileHandle, and there are things
that should be done next.
- Add functionality equivalent to Node's FileHandle to FileHandle
(currently there is only readFile)
---------
Co-authored-by: Matt Mastracci <matthew@mastracci.com>
For the first implementation of node:http2, we'll use the internal
version of `Deno.serve` which allows us to listen on a raw TCP
connection rather than a listener.
This is mostly a refactoring, and hooking up of `op_http_serve_on` that
was never previously exposed (but designed for this purpose).
This PR adds the missing `process.reallyExit()` method to node's
`process` object.
Was [pinged on
twitter](https://twitter.com/biwanczuk/status/1663326659787862017)
regarding running the `fastify` test suite in node. They use `node-tap`
which has been around arguably the longest of the test frameworks and
relies on a couple of old APIs. They have `signal-exit` as a dependency
which in turn [makes use of
`process.reallyExit()`](8fa7fc9a9c/src/index.ts (L19)).
That function cannot be found anywhere in their documentation, but
exists at runtime. See
6a6b3c5402/lib/internal/bootstrap/node.js (L172)
This doesn't yet make `node-tap` work, but gets us one step closer.
Under heavy load, we often have requests queued up that don't need an
async call to retrieve. We can use a fast path sync op to drain this set
of ready requests, and then fall back to the async op once we run out of
work.
This is a .5-1% bump in req/s on an M2 mac. About 90% of the handlers go
through this sync phase (based on a simple instrumentation that is not
included in this PR) and skip the async machinery entirely.
