Currently we only warn once. With this PR, we continue to warn about
not-run scripts on explicit `deno install` (or cache). For `run` (or
other subcommands) we only warn the once, as we do currently.
Refactors the lifecycle scripts code to extract out the common
functionality and then uses that to provide a warning in the global
resolver.
While ideally we would still support them with the global cache, for now
a warning is at least better than the status quo (where people are
unaware why their packages aren't working).
`--allow-run` even with an allow list has essentially been
`--allow-all`... this locks it down more.
1. Resolves allow list for `--allow-run=` on startup to an absolute
path, then uses these paths when evaluating if a command can execute.
Also, adds these paths to `--deny-write`
1. Resolves the environment (cwd and env vars) before evaluating
permissions and before executing a command. Then uses this environment
to evaluate the permissions and then evaluate the command.
This commit effectively turns Deno into Deno 2.0.
This is done by forcing `DENO_FUTURE=1` env var, that was available in
the past few months to try Deno 2 changes.
This commit contains several breaking changes scheduled for Deno 2:
- all deprecated JavaScript APIs are not available any more, mostly
`Deno.*` APIs
- `window` global is removed
- FFI, WebGPU and FS APIs are now stable and don't require
`--unstable-*` flags
- import assertions are no longer supported
- "bring your own node modules" is enabled by default
This is the first commit in a series that are scheduled before the Deno
2 release.
Follow up work is tracked in
https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/25241.
---------
Co-authored-by: Asher Gomez <ashersaupingomez@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Nayeem Rahman <nayeemrmn99@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Nathan Whitaker <nathan@deno.com>
Two small changes:
- In our BYONM errors, suggest running `deno install` instead of `npm
install` if `DENO_FUTURE` is set
- Only emit warning about `deno install` changes if you do `deno install
<foo>` with deno_future unset
Regression from
04f9db5b22
Originally I thought to fix the issue in the PR we needed to explicitly
pass through the `node-modules-dir` flag, but after applying the correct
fix that david pointed out (setting `NPM_PROCESS_STATE`) that wasn't
necessary (or correct).
We had a test for deno task with BYONM, but it only tested with
`"unstable": ["byonm"]` in deno.json, so it didn't catch this.
NPM inserts a default install script when a package has a `binding.gyp`
file.
It's possible, however, for the package to exclude the `binding.gyp`
file when they publish, and in this case the install script will never
succeed for a user of the package.
This happens with `fsevents`, for instance. They don't include the
`binding.gyp` file in their published tarball, but the default install
script appears in the manifest served by `npm`.
This causes us to warn that `fsevents` has an install script, but when
you try to run it it fails due to `binding.gyp` not existing.
Previously when we printed out the packages that skipped install
scripts, we didn't prefix them with `npm:`. When you pass
`--allow-scripts` though, we require `npm:`, which means you can't just
copy paste the package name from the warning message.
Adds support for running npm package lifecycle scripts, opted into via a
new `--allow-scripts` flag.
With this PR, when running `deno cache` (or `DENO_FUTURE=1 deno
install`) you can specify the `--allow-scripts=pkg1,pkg2` flag to run
lifecycle scripts attached to the given packages.
Note at the moment this only works when `nodeModulesDir` is true (using
the local resolver).
When a package with un-run lifecycle scripts is encountered, we emit a
warning suggesting things may not work and to try running lifecycle
scripts. Additionally, if a package script implicitly requires
`node-gyp` and it's not found on the system, we emit a warning.
Extra things in this PR:
- Extracted out bits of `task.rs` into a separate module for reuse
- Added a couple fields to `process.config` in order to support
`node-gyp` (it relies on a few variables being there)
- Drive by fix to downloading new npm packages to test registry
---
TODO:
- [x] validation for allow-scripts args (make sure it looks like an npm
package)
- [x] make allow-scripts matching smarter
- [ ] figure out what issues this closes
---
Review notes:
- This adds a bunch of deps to our test registry due to using
`node-gyp`, so it's pretty noisy
