These methods are confusing because the arguments are backwards. I feel
like they should have never been added to `Option<T>` and that clippy
should suggest rewriting to
`map(...).unwrap_or(...)`/`map(...).unwrap_or_else(|| ...)`
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues/1025
Creating the node_modules folder when the packages are already
downloaded can take a bit of time and not knowing what is going on can
be confusing. It's better to show a progress bar.
This has been bothering me for a while and it became more painful while
working on #18136 because injecting the shared progress bar became very
verbose. Basically we should move the creation of all these npm structs
up to a higher level.
This is a stepping stone for a future refactor where we can improve how
we create all our structs.
There's no point for this API to expect result. If something fails it should
result in a panic during build time to signal to embedder that setup is
wrong.
<!--
Before submitting a PR, please read http://deno.land/manual/contributing
1. Give the PR a descriptive title.
Examples of good title:
- fix(std/http): Fix race condition in server
- docs(console): Update docstrings
- feat(doc): Handle nested reexports
Examples of bad title:
- fix #7123
- update docs
- fix bugs
2. Ensure there is a related issue and it is referenced in the PR text.
3. Ensure there are tests that cover the changes.
4. Ensure `cargo test` passes.
5. Ensure `./tools/format.js` passes without changing files.
6. Ensure `./tools/lint.js` passes.
7. Open as a draft PR if your work is still in progress. The CI won't
run
all steps, but you can add '[ci]' to a commit message to force it to.
8. If you would like to run the benchmarks on the CI, add the 'ci-bench'
label.
-->
This commit updates deno_lint crate to 0.41.0. The new version contains
a braking change that requries a minor code fix here, which is also
addressed in this commit.
This lazily does an "npm install" when any package name matches what's
found in the package.json or when running a script from package.json
with deno task.
Part of #17916
Closes #17928
This commit enables resolution of "bare specifiers" (eg. "import express
from 'express';") if a "package.json" file is discovered.
It's a step towards being able to run projects authored for Node.js
without any changes.
With this commit we are able to successfully run Vite projects without
any changes to the user code.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Sherret <dsherret@gmail.com>
This changes npm specifiers to be handled by deno_graph and resolved to
an npm package name and version when the specifier is encountered. It
also slightly changes how npm specifier resolution occurs—previously it
would collect all the npm specifiers and resolve them all at once, but
now it resolves them on the fly as they are encountered in the module
graph.
https://github.com/denoland/deno_graph/pull/232
---------
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
This PR fixes peer dependency resolution to only resolve peers based on
the current graph traversal path. Previously, it would resolve a peers
by looking at a graph node's ancestors, which is not correct because
graph nodes are shared by different resolutions.
It also stores more information about peer dependency resolution in the
lockfile.
This commits adds auto-discovery of "package.json" file when running
"deno run" and "deno task" subcommands. In case of "deno run" the
"package.json" is being looked up starting from the directory of the
script that is being run, stopping early if "deno.json(c)" file is found
(ie. FS tree won't be traversed "up" from "deno.json").
When "package.json" is discovered the "--node-modules-dir" flag is
implied, leading to creation of local "node_modules/" directory - we
did that, because most tools relying on "package.json" will expect
"node_modules/" directory to be present (eg. Vite). Additionally
"dependencies" and "devDependencies" specified in the "package.json"
are downloaded on startup.
This is a stepping stone to supporting bare specifier imports, but
the actual integration will be done in a follow up commit.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Sherret <dsherret@gmail.com>
This commit changes handling of config file to enable
specifying "imports" and "scopes" objects effectively making
the configuration file an import map.
"imports" and "scopes" take precedence over "importMap" configuration,
but have lower priority than "--importmap" CLI flag.
Co-authored-by: David Sherret <dsherret@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: David Sherret <dsherret@gmail.com>
The way the standalone mode handles the `--cert` flag is different to
all other modes. This is because `--cert` takes a path to the
certificate file, which is directly added to the root cert store; except
for compile mode, where its byte contents are stored in the standalone
metadata, and they are added to the root cert store after the
`ProcState` is created.
This change instead changes `Flags::ca_file` (an `Option<String>`) into
`Flags::ca_data`, which can represent a `String` file path or a
`Vec<u8>` with the certificate contents. That way, standalone mode can
create a `ProcState` whose root cert store alreay contains the
certificate.
This change also adds a tests for certificates in standalone mode, since
there weren't any before.
This refactor will help with implementing web workers in standalone mode
in the future.
This commit changes signature of "deno_core::ModuleLoader::resolve" to pass
an enum indicating whether or not we're resolving a specifier for dynamic import.
Additionally "CliModuleLoader" was changes to store both "parent permissions" (or
"root permissions") as well as "dynamic permissions" that allow to check for permissions
in top-level module load an dynamic imports.
Then all code paths that have anything to do with Node/npm compat are now checking
for permissions which are passed from module loader instance associated with given
worker.
Turns out we were cloning permissions which after prompting were discarded,
so the state of permissions was never preserved. To handle that we need to store
all permissions behind "Arc<Mutex<>>" (because there are situations where we
need to send them to other thread).
Testing and benching code still uses "Permissions" in most places - it's undesirable
to share the same permission set between various test/bench files - otherwise
granting or revoking permissions in one file would influence behavior of other test
files.
