Fixes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/26904
If using `nodeModulesDir: "auto"`, it's possible for the lifecycle
script subprocess to try to set up the node_modules dir (despite the
fact that we're already doing that). If it does that, it hangs trying to
acquire the file lock on the node_modules dir.
As a fix, don't try to set up node_modules if we're running as part of a
lifecycle script.
Ideally we'd have better control over when we do and don't set up
node_modules automatically (that's the underlying problem behind #25782
as well)
Fixes #26677
Some packages (like supabase) declare bin entries that don't exist until
lifecycle scripts are run. For instance, the lifecycle script downloads
a binary file which serves as a bin entrypoint.
Unfortunately you can't just defer setting up the bin entries until
after lifecycle scripts have run, because the scripts may rely on them.
I looked into this, and PNPM just re-links bin entries after running
lifecycle scripts. I think that's about the best we can do as well.
Note that we'll only re-setup bin entries for packages whose lifecycle
scripts we run. This should limit the performance cost, as typically a
given project will not have many lifecycle scripts (and of those, many
of them probably don't have bin entries to set up).
Fixes #26116.
Handle the new error and treat is as lacking permission to make
symlinks, but also to make this more robust, just always fall back to
junctions no matter what the actual error is. Instead, warn if the error
isn't one we've handled, but go on to attempt creating the junction
* cts support
* better cjs/cts type checking
* deno compile cjs/cts support
* More efficient detect cjs (going towards stabilization)
* Determination of whether .js, .ts, .jsx, or .tsx is cjs or esm is only
done after loading
* Support `import x = require(...);`
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
Fixes #25998. Fixes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/25928.
Originally I was just going to make this an error message instead of a
panic, but once I got to a minimal repro I felt that this really should
work.
The panic occurs when you have `nodeModulesDir: manual` (or a
package.json present), and you have an npm package with a tag in your
deno.json (see the spec test that illustrates this).
This code path only actually executes when trying to choose an
appropriate package version from `node_modules/.deno`, so we should be
able to fix it by storing some extra data at install time.
The fix proposed here is to repurpose the `.initialized` file that we
store in `node_modules` to store the tags associated with a package.
Basically, if you have a version requirement with a tag (e.g.
`npm:chalk@latest`), when we set up the node_modules folder for that
package, we store the tag (`latest`) in `.initialized`. Then, when doing
BYONM resolution, if we have a version requirement with a tag, we read
that file and check if the tag is present.
The downside is that we do more work when setting up `node_modules`. We
_could_ do this only when BYONM is enabled, but that would have the
downside of needing to re-run `deno install` when you switch from auto
-> manual, though maybe that's not a big deal.
Fixes #25861.
Previously we were attempting to match the version requirement against
the version already present in `node_modules` root, and if they didn't
match we would create a node_modules dir in the workspace member's
directory with the dependency.
Aside from the fact that this caused the panic, on second thought it
just doesn't make sense in general. We shouldn't be semver matching, as
resolution has already occurred and decided what package versions are
required. Instead, we can just compare the versions directly.
`esbuild` can work fine without needing to run post-install script, so
to make it easier on users (especially people using Vite) we are not prompting to run with
`--allow-scripts` again.
We only do that for version >= 0.18.0 to be sure.
Currently we only warn once. With this PR, we continue to warn about
not-run scripts on explicit `deno install` (or cache). For `run` (or
other subcommands) we only warn the once, as we do currently.
Fixes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/25862.
npm only makes bin entries executable if they get linked into `.bin`, as
we did before this PR. So this PR actually deviates from npm, because
it's the only reasonable way to fix this that I can think of.
---
The reason this was broken in moment is the following:
Moment has dependencies on two typescript versions: 1.8 and 3.1
If you have two packages with conflicting bin entries (i.e. two
typescript versions which both have a bin entry `tsc`), in npm it is
non-deterministic and undefined which one will end up in `.bin`.
npm, due to implementation differences, chooses to put typescript 1.8
into the `.bin` directory, and so `node_modules/typescript/bin/tsc` ends
up getting marked executable. We, however, choose typescript 3.2, and so
we end up making `node_modules/typescript3/bin/tsc` executable.
As part of its tests, moment executes `node_modules/typescript/bin/tsc`.
Because we didn't make it executable, this fails.
Since the conflict resolution is undefined in npm, instead of trying to
match it, I think it makes more sense to just make bin entries
executable even if they aren't chosen in the case of a conflict.
Refactors the lifecycle scripts code to extract out the common
functionality and then uses that to provide a warning in the global
resolver.
While ideally we would still support them with the global cache, for now
a warning is at least better than the status quo (where people are
unaware why their packages aren't working).
This was initially added in #25399 in order to make transitioning over
from package.json to deno.json more easy, but it causes some problems
that are shown in the issue and it also means that the output of `deno
install` would have different resolution than `npm install`. Overall, I
think it's too much complexity to be smarter about this and it's
probably best to not do it. If someone needs an aliased folder then they
should keep using a package.json
Closes #25538
This allows using npm deps of jsr deps without having to add them to the
root package.json.
Works by taking the package requirement and scanning the
`node_modules/.deno` directory for the best matching package, so it
relies on deno's node_modules structure.
Additionally to make the transition from package.json to deno.json
easier, Deno now:
1. Installs npm deps in a deno.json at the same time as installing npm
deps from a package.json.
2. Uses the alias in the import map for `node_modules/<alias>` for
better package.json compatiblity.
Regression from
04f9db5b22
Originally I thought to fix the issue in the PR we needed to explicitly
pass through the `node-modules-dir` flag, but after applying the correct
fix that david pointed out (setting `NPM_PROCESS_STATE`) that wasn't
necessary (or correct).
We had a test for deno task with BYONM, but it only tested with
`"unstable": ["byonm"]` in deno.json, so it didn't catch this.
NPM inserts a default install script when a package has a `binding.gyp`
file.
It's possible, however, for the package to exclude the `binding.gyp`
file when they publish, and in this case the install script will never
succeed for a user of the package.
This happens with `fsevents`, for instance. They don't include the
`binding.gyp` file in their published tarball, but the default install
script appears in the manifest served by `npm`.
This causes us to warn that `fsevents` has an install script, but when
you try to run it it fails due to `binding.gyp` not existing.
Previously when we printed out the packages that skipped install
scripts, we didn't prefix them with `npm:`. When you pass
`--allow-scripts` though, we require `npm:`, which means you can't just
copy paste the package name from the warning message.
Adds support for running npm package lifecycle scripts, opted into via a
new `--allow-scripts` flag.
With this PR, when running `deno cache` (or `DENO_FUTURE=1 deno
install`) you can specify the `--allow-scripts=pkg1,pkg2` flag to run
lifecycle scripts attached to the given packages.
Note at the moment this only works when `nodeModulesDir` is true (using
the local resolver).
When a package with un-run lifecycle scripts is encountered, we emit a
warning suggesting things may not work and to try running lifecycle
scripts. Additionally, if a package script implicitly requires
`node-gyp` and it's not found on the system, we emit a warning.
Extra things in this PR:
- Extracted out bits of `task.rs` into a separate module for reuse
- Added a couple fields to `process.config` in order to support
`node-gyp` (it relies on a few variables being there)
- Drive by fix to downloading new npm packages to test registry
---
TODO:
- [x] validation for allow-scripts args (make sure it looks like an npm
package)
- [x] make allow-scripts matching smarter
- [ ] figure out what issues this closes
---
Review notes:
- This adds a bunch of deps to our test registry due to using
`node-gyp`, so it's pretty noisy
Adds much better support for the unstable Deno workspaces as well as
support for npm workspaces. npm workspaces is still lacking in that we
only install packages into the root node_modules folder. We'll make it
smarter over time in order for it to figure out when to add node_modules
folders within packages.
This includes a breaking change in config file resolution where we stop
searching for config files on the first found package.json unless it's
in a workspace. For the previous behaviour, the root deno.json needs to
be updated to be a workspace by adding `"workspace":
["./path-to-pkg-json-folder-goes-here"]`. See details in
https://github.com/denoland/deno_config/pull/66
Closes #24340
Closes #24159
Closes #24161
Closes #22020
Closes #18546
Closes #16106
Closes #24160
Also removes permissions being passed in for node resolution. It was
completely useless because we only checked it for reading package.json
files, but Deno reading package.json files for resolution is perfectly
fine.
My guess is this is also a perf improvement because Deno is doing less
work.
Fixes #24012.
In the case of multiple packages providing a binary with a same name, we
were basically leaving the results undefined (since we set up things in
parallel, and whichever got set up first won). In addition, we were
warning about these cases, even though it's a situation that's expected
to occur.
Instead, in the case of a collision in the binary names, we prefer the
binary provided by the package with the least depth in the dependency
tree.
While I was at it, I also took moved more code to `bin_entries.rs` since
it was starting to get a bit cluttered.
The same issue in two different places - doing blocking FS work in an
async task, limiting the amount of work that happens concurrently.
- When setting up node_modules, where we try to set up entries
concurrently but were blocking other tasks from actually running.
- When loading package info from the npm registry file cache, loading
and deserializing is expensive and prevents concurrency. This was
especially noticeable when loading an npm resolution snapshot from a
lockfile (`snapshot_from_lockfile` in `deno_npm`).
Installing deps in `deno-docs`:
```
❯ hyperfine -i -p 'rm -rf node_modules/' '../d7/deno-main i' '../d7/target/release/deno i'
Benchmark 1: ../d7/deno-main i
Time (mean ± σ): 2.193 s ± 0.027 s [User: 0.589 s, System: 1.033 s]
Range (min … max): 2.151 s … 2.242 s 10 runs
Benchmark 2: ../d7/target/release/deno i
Time (mean ± σ): 1.597 s ± 0.021 s [User: 0.977 s, System: 1.337 s]
Range (min … max): 1.550 s … 1.627 s 10 runs
Summary
../d7/target/release/deno i ran
1.37 ± 0.02 times faster than ../d7/deno-main i
```
Caching `npm:@11ty/eleventy`:
```
❯ hyperfine -i -p 'rm -rf node_modules/' --warmup 5 '../../d7/deno-main cache npm:@11ty/eleventy' '../../d7/target/release/deno cache npm:@11ty/eleventy'
Benchmark 1: ../../d7/deno-main cache npm:@11ty/eleventy
Time (mean ± σ): 129.9 ms ± 2.2 ms [User: 27.5 ms, System: 101.3 ms]
Range (min … max): 127.5 ms … 135.8 ms 10 runs
Benchmark 2: ../../d7/target/release/deno cache npm:@11ty/eleventy
Time (mean ± σ): 100.6 ms ± 1.3 ms [User: 38.8 ms, System: 233.8 ms]
Range (min … max): 99.3 ms … 103.2 ms 10 runs
Summary
../../d7/target/release/deno cache npm:@11ty/eleventy ran
1.29 ± 0.03 times faster than ../../d7/deno-main cache npm:@11ty/eleventy
```
---------
Co-authored-by: David Sherret <dsherret@gmail.com>
