The page grew over the past year to have redundancies and
inconsistencies. It is organized to keep sections that are common to
all machines in one place:
* LXC container creation
* Forgejo runner creation
* DRBD
* vSwitch
The other sections are unified (Disk partitioning).
- add a checklist to the release instructions
- use a pattern for push instead of an explicit list of branches
it was previously advisable to avoid conflicts when there was
no automated backports but it is no longer necessary
Per "request" of @0ko in https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3270#issuecomment-1774032
TODOs
- postponed: how to add codespell (written in Python) to CI -- separate workflow? add to some other step? to some other tool/specification?
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/536
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
Co-committed-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
- LTS are listed in the table, no hint in the version number
- update the RC release names
- CLI updates
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/561
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
They get /forgejo/forgejo/archive/100448a007707c049a769cb71cd170fcb5b64a25.bundle
despite https://code.forgejo.org/robots.txt having
Disallow: /*/*/archive/
Disallow: /*/*/archive/*.bundle
* Release number is v7.0.0+1.22.0 and following semantic versioning
* Remove the workflow page which is no longer needed as:
* it is implicitly understood pull requests go to the default branch
* testing requirements are documented in the testing.md page
* Explain how to cut a release and set the tag in forgejo-integration
for proper numbering of the test releases that come out of the
development branch
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2448
Preview: https://forgejo.codeberg.page/@docs_pull_427/docs/next/admin/customization/
---
The previous version of this document insinuated that you need to be
familiar with Forgejo's source code and compile Forgejo from source
for custom branding changes. As of the most recent Forgejo version,
this is not necessarily true, as custom files can be served from
the CustomPath.
Administrators that were not developers therefore dismissed the
other guide and its contents without reading this, and I was one
of them. I thought it would make sense for this file to provide
information on where to put a custom logo. This change does not
fix it (this will be done later), but it will reduce the confusion
for now.
This warning confused me personally and other Forgejo users, as I
had one person tell me IRL that they thought that it was not possible
to serve a custom logo.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/427
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Panagiotis "Ivory" Vasilopoulos <git@n0toose.net>
Co-committed-by: Panagiotis "Ivory" Vasilopoulos <git@n0toose.net>
